Because players don't tank entire seasons, especially when they're young and they're playing for their future contracts as well.
I can understand tanking when you are rebuilding and you have players who are not part of your future, but if your roster is almost fully built by 20 y.o. players, what's the point?
Next season we are going to play with 4 sophmores and 3 rookies (maybe four?). Let them play and see how good they are.
If they're good, future is bright. If they're not, you get the high pick you want, with no tanking.
Better start to create a group of guys who know each other, who help each other, and love to play together if possibile.
Stability is important, check out the Spurs when they win lots of games leaving all their best players on the bench.
Keep Joerger, keep Vlade, keep these kids and see how it goes. I'm just afraid as soon as something good is coming up, something bad happens, as always.
I can understand tanking when you are rebuilding and you have players who are not part of your future, but if your roster is almost fully built by 20 y.o. players, what's the point?
Next season we are going to play with 4 sophmores and 3 rookies (maybe four?). Let them play and see how good they are.
If they're good, future is bright. If they're not, you get the high pick you want, with no tanking.
Better start to create a group of guys who know each other, who help each other, and love to play together if possibile.
Stability is important, check out the Spurs when they win lots of games leaving all their best players on the bench.
Keep Joerger, keep Vlade, keep these kids and see how it goes. I'm just afraid as soon as something good is coming up, something bad happens, as always.