Fire PDA!

Status
Not open for further replies.

hrdboild

Moloch in whom I dream Angels!
Staff member
Not tiresome to me. The team is in the midst of an overhaul, and everybody wants to demand accountability before one minute has been played on the floor. It is crazy. There are actually people who don't think Tyreke was "all that". Most of the outrage seems based on the premise that Tyreke was ALL THAT and letting him go was an epic botch. But I don't see how anybody in their right mind can deny Vivek the prerogative to build the kind of team he wants, even if it is smallball, nellieball, or whatever else. This front office didn't want Tyreke!!! That's it end of discussion. This front office prefers Monta to Tyreke!!! Hold your breath till you turn blue, boycott, cuss out PDA... have a ball. The team is being overhauled top to bottom, apparently sparing DMC. The mean spirited insults hurled at PDA are disappointing. Frankly, I don't believe the elite core of kingsfans.com know-it-alls have better NBA acumen than Vivek and Pete, no matter what your post count. I think reasonable people can disagree, but the tone of the attacks on PDA is not one of mutual respect and disagreement on approach or style. They are blistering attacks, calling the guy an idiot. I find it appalling.
Respect is earned, not freely granted. He had a clean slate from everybody here when he took the job. I agree the name calling thing is over the top, but people are upset. Some of it is tongue in cheek anyway. But I can't emphasize enough, that this is nothing new. We go through this every year. The only thing that's really different about this off-season so far is the pronounced presence of new people telling us to stop discussing basketball and start buying tickets instead like grateful fans. I was upset when we traded for Jimmer and Salmons. I was upset when we included a first round pick, protected or no, in the Hickson trade. I was upset when we overspent on Marcus Thornton and I was upset when we chose to pay Chuck Hayes instead of Samuel Dalembert. I would think that the results of these moves all going more less as I predicted would have earned me some credibility with my analysis. But notice I'm still here. Obviously I'm sticking around anyway, I just want to see the team win games. If all this group cares about is selling tickets than I guess it doesn't matter who they choose to sign or not sign. But if they want to actually win more games then they lose, it matters a lot. And that's what we're talking about here. It's not about next season, it's about the next 4+ seasons.
 
seriously. nobody's asking for a miracle. i was just hoping to see smart basketball moves [to improve the defense], as opposed to desperate basketball moves [to improve an offense that should hardly have been a priority]. i was even okay with the new regime punting on PF this offseason. i'm posting this lineup again for the sixth or seventh time:

PG tyreke evans
SG ben mclemore
SF matt barnes
PF jason thompson
C demarcus cousins

that team likely isn't playoff-bound. but a trio of evans/mclemore/barnes has endless defensive potential. as a result of those three cutting off penetration on a nightly basis, the kings would likely improve as a team, defensively. and that would likely help to get them above the 30-win threshold for the first time in years. then you address the other needs, and continue to improve in an upward trajectory...
That right there is not a 30 win team. That is a 20 win team at best. You have only one play maker/ball handler on that team who will primarily be looking for his own shot. Every play with Evans' talent set needs a ball handling guard next to them.

That team might allow 95-100 PPG, but they are only going to score 80-85.

The NOH don't even see Evans as a PG, which is why they are playing him next to Holliday, and maybe even Gordon.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
She's in a bad position as a public facing wing of Vivek and co especially since she just knows enough basketball to try to argue.

I feel bad for her. It shouldn't be her job to defend the FO moves - that should fall on PDA - but she's accessible.

That said, the "are you a season ticket holder" bit IS insulting. So is Carmichael Dave telling people to "STFU" because the team was nearly gone. Both are ways of not having to actually defend bad basketball moves by deflecting.
I've enjoyed following Leslie's tweets but this whole debacle today is her fault. If she hadn't played the "someone just stepped in & saved them for you" card she wouldn't have opened the can of worms.

She could easily have said something about the front office working towards a better team, you have to break eggs to make omelets, etc. but she came back with a snarky comment that Ron did not deserve. Se needs to realize that our fan base has been through hell and back, we're desperate to support the front office and truly want everything to turn around. She wasn't here in the bad times; she has no idea what it is to live through what we did over the past 7 or so years. Patience? We're trying but we were on life support, flat-lined and were brought back right as we were walking towards the light. She can't expect us to just sit back and watch what makes no sense. We NEED to know we aren't just going to end up in the same old place, but on a different train.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
Buy tickets. When people were hoping and pleading for someone to stop Hansen from taking the Kings, there was an implied promise to buy tickets. Buy them. And you can flame PDA all you want on the message boards, but please buy tickets so the NBA knows it was the right decision to keep the team here.
That's completely backwards logic. The onus is on the new ownership group to turn things around and show that a successful team CAN be built in this market. Loyalty is a two way street and the Kings fans (myself included) have held up their end of the bargain for three decades with the team a hopeless shambles for more than 2/3 of those years. I have no intention of buying season tickets again until I see signs that things have really changed. That doesn't mean a contending or playoff team. It means a recognizable direction. It means seeing smart moves. It means not ignoring the reality of what roster changes have been made thus far.

If the story that is ultimately going to be told is that it is impossible to ever build a winning team in Sacramento then quite frankly keeping the team here was NOT the right decision by the NBA. I don't believe that's the conclusion that should be drawn though. Yes, this is a tougher market to build a winner in than LA or NY, but we've seen before that it is possible.
 
Last edited:
I see nothing wrong with this. Free country and all that remember?

This is a public site, it's not like he is tweeting private info.

Also, I sorta agree with him. You guys have absolutely gone berserker. I am seriously considering setting up an account at STR because of all this. I've been here for a decade, and this is just nuts.

I'm not happy about Landry, I also don't want Monta. But if you read between the lines of Leslies tweets, we don't have trade-able assets. Definitely not to the level our fans think.

So debate the moves, but take it down a notch.
 

Spike

Subsidiary Intermediary
Staff member
I've enjoyed following Leslie's tweets but this whole debacle today is her fault. If she hadn't played the "someone just stepped in & saved them for you" card she wouldn't have opened the can of worms.

She could easily have said something about the front office working towards a better team, you have to break eggs to make omelets, etc. but she came back with a snarky comment that Ron did not deserve. Se needs to realize that our fan base has been through hell and back, we're desperate to support the front office and truly want everything to turn around. She wasn't here in the bad times; she has no idea what it is to live through what we did over the past 7 or so years. Patience? We're trying but we were on life support, flat-lined and were brought back right as we were walking towards the light. She can't expect us to just sit back and watch what makes no sense. We NEED to know we aren't just going to end up in the same old place, but on a different train.
*Favorited*
 
Not tiresome to me. The team is in the midst of an overhaul, and everybody wants to demand accountability before one minute has been played on the floor. It is crazy. There are actually people who don't think Tyreke was "all that". Most of the outrage seems based on the premise that Tyreke was ALL THAT and letting him go was an epic botch. But I don't see how anybody in their right mind can deny Vivek the prerogative to build the kind of team he wants, even if it is smallball, nellieball, or whatever else. This front office didn't want Tyreke!!! That's it end of discussion. This front office prefers Monta to Tyreke!!! Hold your breath till you turn blue, boycott, cuss out PDA... have a ball. The team is being overhauled top to bottom, apparently sparing DMC. The mean spirited insults hurled at PDA are disappointing. Frankly, I don't believe the elite core of kingsfans.com know-it-alls have better NBA acumen than Vivek and Pete, no matter what your post count. I think reasonable people can disagree, but the tone of the attacks on PDA is not one of mutual respect and disagreement on approach or style. They are blistering attacks, calling the guy an idiot. I find it appalling.
I agree. I will wait and see what happens on the court before passing judgement on what is, or what might, happen. Plus, the bar is set very low with a 28 win team IMHO.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
I see nothing wrong with this. Free country and all that remember?
I see nothing wrong with it either even though he's quoting my post.

He also said that if in two years the team wasn't turned around he'd be grabbing a pitchfork as well. We'll see.

These are kneejerk reactions from me. I know that. I'm a passionate fan and I'm upset, especially given the optimism I had going into this summer and the high of the Kings staying. But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm wrong either. I'll have plenty of time to see the "big picture" during the season and beyond, but right now I'm unhappy with the Evans trade, unhappy with the Landry signing, unhappy with the bungled Iguodala talks, unhappy with the reports of signing Ellis and unhappy with the lack of caproom & flexibility we are seeing be created while still lacking a starting SF.

Dave is right. This ownership group deserves two years to try and fix things. But they are making it very hard for me to give them that patience and support right now.
 
It's almost as though the FO expected carte blanche for a few years from the fans. Social media is the double edged sword. If you want to be connected with the fans, you're going to have to deal with being connected with the fans. I don't know who @LillyAnnFrazier is, but man, she's come out with both fists swinging.
i talk basketball with kf.com, my father, my wife, and a couple of my friends. but that's about it. and, given the manner in which i present any basketball-related argument, it's pretty easy to convince my father, my wife, and a couple of my friends to agree with me. kf.com is often a different story, but it's nice to know that there are others out there who feel as some of us here feel: a core of cousins/evans/mclemore had infinitely greater potential than what we're seeing the front office assemble as an alternative...

lilly ann frazier is a twitter hero, as far as i'm concerned. she's going to bat for those of us who aren't satisfied with a rudderless offseason when there were very obvious moves to make that could have pointed this team in the eventual direction of the playoffs, those of us who believe that we deserve a smart organization that is committed to building a winner. we are uninterested in novelty. we value defense, rebounding, efficiency, post scoring, and penetration, skillsets that are more likely to get you into the playoffs than any other...

it's incredibly insulting to me to insinuate that i should purchase season tickets before i'm considered a committed fan. i have an old, faded photograph dated november of 1992. i was sitting on my father's lap. we were watching a kings game. i was five years old. it's been over twenty years that i've followed this team, and there were a great many more losing seasons in that span than there were winning seasons...

as much as i didn't want the maloofs to uproot the kings that i love, i also don't want to be told that i should appreciate with unquestioning resolve that i even have a team to root for. i am a worthy evaluator of talent, and it is entirely within my province to call out a shoddy gameplan when i see it. kings fans have suffered through a lot of mismanagement and sabotage in the last decade, and we expected to see upward momentum when the book was finally closed on the maloof family's ownership of the franchise. there is an urgency among us, and it does not qualify as impatience to make our desires known...
 
Last edited:

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
This is a public site, it's not like he is tweeting private info.

Also, I sorta agree with him. You guys have absolutely gone berserker. I am seriously considering setting up an account at STR because of all this. I've been here for a decade, and this is just nuts.

I'm not happy about Landry, I also don't want Monta. But if you read between the lines of Leslies tweets, we don't have trade-able assets. Definitely not to the level our fans think.

So debate the moves, but take it down a notch.
But THAT is precisely why I'm upset. If you acknowledge that the team is full of mediocre, overpaid players (Salmons, Thornton, Outlaw, Hayes etc) then why add too more overpaid guys that you can't later trade in Landry and Ellis? Why not clear capspace?
 
i talk basketball with kf.com, my father, my wife, and a couple of my friends. but that's about it. and, given the manner in which i present any basketball-related argument, it's pretty easy to convince my father, my wife, and a couple of my friends to agree with me. kf.com is often a different story, but it's nice to know that there are others out there who feel as some of us here feel: a core of cousins/evans/mclemore had infinitely greater potential than what we're seeing the front office assemble as an alternative...

lilly ann frazier is a twitter hero, as far as i'm concerned. she's going to bat for those of us who aren't satisfied with a rudderless offseason when there were very obvious moves to make that could have pointed this team in the eventual direction of the playoffs, those of us who believe that we deserve a smart organization that is committed to building a winner. we are uninterested in novelty. we value defense, rebounding, efficiency, post scoring, and penetration, skillsets that are more likely to get you into the playoffs than any other...

it's incredibly insulting to me to insinuate that i should purchase season tickets before i'm considered a committed fan. i have an old, faded photograph dated november of 1992. i was sitting on my father's lap. we were watching a kings game. i was five years old. it's been over twenty years that i've followed this team, and there were a great many more losing seasons in that span than there were winning seasons...

as much as i didn't want the maloofs to uproot the kings that i love, i also don't want to be told that i should appreciate with unquestioning resolve that i even have a team to root for. i am a worthy evaluator of talent, and it is entirely within my province to call out a shoddy gameplan when i see it. kings fans have suffered through a lot of mismanagement and sabotage in the last decade, and we expected to see upward momentum when the book was finally closed on the maloof family's ownership of the franchise. there is an urgency among us, and it does not qualify as impatience to make our desires known...
Amen to that good sir! Being a season ticket holder shouldn't make you a better fan than others. I'm a season ticket holder myself but I don't brag about it in this forum because it is irrelevant to most of the topics on here. It shouldn't matter if you watch from STA or from home. A fan is a fan and everyone's opinions are equally important.
 
I don't get the fans complaining about how other fans be fans.

I mean, I'm not personally a fan of the overdramatic, but then I just try to skip over it. What's the point of singling people out and complaining that they're doing it wrong?

Sorry... just doesn't make sense to me.
 
I think most fans are willing to see this through before judging. They're just not willing to spend the time online arguing a pointless case. It's still in progress, step back from the edge....
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
Now this is an interesting take:

Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave 2m

“@KevinShockey: @CarmichaelDave the moment that there aren't sky is falling fans in ANY fanbase is a bad moment. Embrace it, I say.” Agreed

As Shockey said, and Dave agreed, some fans are complaining the sky is falling, but at least they still care enough to worry about it. Granted some people have gone off the deep end, but they're not out of the pool.

I LOVE THIS TEAM ... and I love this sometimes dysfunctional family we call Kingsfans.com

GO KINGS!!!
 
Amen to that good sir! Being a season ticket holder shouldn't make you a better fan than others. I'm a season ticket holder myself but I don't brag about it in this forum because it is irrelevant to most of the topics on here. It shouldn't matter if you watch from STA or from home. A fan is a fan and everyone's opinions are equally important.
Well said.
 
I am seriously considering setting up an account at STR because of all this. I've been here for a decade, and this is just nuts.
I'll save you some time. That's my regular spot. The exact same thing is going on over there. If you can't deal with the criticism of these moves then you probably should just get off of the internet for a while.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
No, but the implication is my lack of class. Am I misreading that??

For what it's worth (nothing), you may be the worst of the bunch. You and Brick. Just my .02


Free country and all.
Astute observation. Since you're into defining real fans on twitter, I'd say a real fan is someone willing to go beyond putting blind faith into any and every move this FO makes. A real fan is someone who cares enough to analyze the pros and cons of moves and potential moves. A real fan actually applies a little more thought into transactions of his/her team than, arguing to be patient and the "sky is falling" strawman crap counter rebuttal.

If you can support a single one of these moves without the stance that they simply require patience and/or be grateful Vivek saved the team, I'll be impressed. Remember Smart, Hayes, Salmons, Outlaw, trading Beno, TRob, signing Brooks? All we needed was patience then too, even though a number of us knew they were poor moves. When you and Napear have backed every move made the last few years and preached patience, you lose credibility when using that same argument once again.

Yes, free country and all.
 
That right there is not a 30 win team. That is a 20 win team at best. You have only one play maker/ball handler on that team who will primarily be looking for his own shot. Every play with Evans' talent set needs a ball handling guard next to them.

That team might allow 95-100 PPG, but they are only going to score 80-85.

The NOH don't even see Evans as a PG, which is why they are playing him next to Holliday, and maybe even Gordon.
PG isaiah thomas
SG tyreke evans
SF john salmons
PF jason thompson
C demarcus cousins

they won 28 games with a PG who couldn't guard my grandma and a SF who regularly disappeared, statistically, for weeks at a time. matt barnes is a more than adequate ball handler and is perfectly capable of swinging the ball in a given offensive set, though he doesn't need the ball in his hands to be effective. on top of that, he's as pesky a wing defender as you will find in this league. contrary to popular belief, evans can initiate the offense just fine, particularly when paired with shooters who can actually make use of his passes (instead of the john salmons' and james johnson's and omri casspi's of the league). the mock-lineup i presented is perfectly capable of winning more than 30 games with a head coach that places defense first...

kings fans really need to drop this scoring nonsense. a team that actively makes demarcus cousins its first option, tyreke evans its second option, and surrounds them with defensive roleplayers who can hit the occasional outside shot (mclemore and barnes) will score more than enough points to win games with defense. y'know, rather than loading up your rotation with chuckers and telling each player he has a green light to shoot. you always give yourself a better chance to win when you a) define roles and b) rely on defense. always.
 
Last edited:
Now this is an interesting take:

Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave 2m

“@KevinShockey: @CarmichaelDave the moment that there aren't sky is falling fans in ANY fanbase is a bad moment. Embrace it, I say.” Agreed

As Shockey said, and Dave agreed, some fans are complaining the sky is falling, but at least they still care enough to worry about it. Granted some people have gone off the deep end, but they're not out of the pool.

I LOVE THIS TEAM ... and I love this sometimes dysfunctional family we call Kingsfans.com

GO KINGS!!!
Thanks for being the steady hand for us. Thank goodness this is an online forum and not a Town hall Meeting. Might have a riot on our hands. A lot of us are happy the team is here, but we are just unhappy with the moves thus far.
 
For what it's worth (nothing), you may be the worst of the bunch. You and Brick. Just my .02
That's funny because for what it's worth (also nothing), both of them have the most accurate assessment of this situation of anyone on this site. Just my .02.

I guess those of us that aren't will to blindly accept the 'plan' of the new FO are just bad fans...
 
"Stay Classy Dave. Look what this guy is posting on twitter"

How does that statement suggest you don't have any problem with it?
I gotta agree with Jamal here, you made it pretty clear that you thought what Dave said was wrong. If you didn't have a problem with it, why say "Stay
classy Dave?"
 
Astute observation. Since you're into defining real fans on twitter, I'd say a real fan is someone willing to go beyond putting blind faith into any and every move this FO makes. A real fan is someone who cares enough to analyze the pros and cons of moves and potential moves. A real fan actually applies a little more thought into transactions of his/her team than, arguing to be patient and the "sky is falling" strawman crap counter rebuttal.

If you can support a single one of these moves without the stance that they simply require patience and/or be grateful Vivek saved the team, I'll be impressed. Remember Smart, Hayes, Salmons, Outlaw, trading Beno, TRob, signing Brooks? All we needed was patience then too, even though a number of us knew they were poor moves. When you and Napear have backed every move made the last few years and preached patience, you lose credibility when using that same argument once again.

Yes, free country and all.
There you go again screaming your superiority to the world. This "real fan" is utter nonsense. A fan is someone who supports their team in any capacity they wish. Real fan. Please

Dave already said Monta would be a bad move for the Kings. The difference is he's going to wait for some NBA basketball before lining up with pitchforks in front of PDA's house. Who knows, maybe Monta-Cousins becomes the next great duo in the NBA? It's not likely, but can you tell me with 100% certainty it won't be? No
 
Status
Not open for further replies.