i remain firmly in the "fire PDA" camp, and primarily because of his claim that he wouldn't have cared how many wins that michael malone may have been able to amass with a completely healthy roster, he still would have fired him. i simply cannot fathom such arrogance from a first-time gm, and i simply cannot abide a front office that values its on-court philosophy over legitimate culture change, defensive improvement, and measurable gains in the win column, especially when the philosophy in question is burdened by considerable inexperience...
pete d'alessandro's resume doesn't exactly sparkle with on-court acumen. that said, i'm always going to be unlikely to side with an ex-lawyer/ex-player agent over a basketball lifer like mike malone who was milking results from a roster that is, quite frankly, not nearly as talented as the front office seems to believe. until PDA gives me a tangible reason to buy into his "vision," he's skating across the thinnest of ice. i'm already incensed by the new regime's decision to unnecessarily throw away this season, and by the empty platitudes and lofty abstractions they used to justify such a decision. it's all talk, at this point, and i need to see the on-court representation of "nba 3.0" yield results in the win column as soon as humanly possible. if the start of next season is not as promising as the start to this season was, then there is no question in my mind that PDA should be fired, especially since we can't call for the owner to be fired. but we can hope that vivek ranadive learns from his mistakes...