There's obviously precedent. Nepotism is hardly a new phenomenon in a billionaire's club like the NBA. But until Vivek illustrates his competence as an owner, and displays a modicum of self-awareness, his credibility will remain in question, and he's going to catch heat for decisions like this, even if they're small offenses in the grand scheme of things. For me, it's simple: maybe sort out a few things with the franchise you've been grossly mismanaging before you start handing out important jobs to your unqualified children? This franchise is not the Jerry Buss-owned Lakers, after all, nor does it have anything close to the kind of reputation that can just slag off the criticisms that have been consistently leveled at the Kings since Vivek bought the controlling stake in the team. You're right; it's really a non-story. But I think most fans are justifiably fed up with constantly having their worst suspicions of Vivek confirmed.