Yahoo Sports: Sacramento's Savior

#1
Good article:

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_y...?slug=aw-sacramento111606&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Sacramento's savior

By Adrian Wojnarowski, Yahoo! Sports
November 16, 2006


The commissioner was working late on Wednesday, a conference call cutting into his evening commute out of midtown Manhattan. Far from the big city, out in the sticks in Sacramento, David Stern wanted to send word: The NBA isn't letting the Sacramento Kings leave without a fight.

The Maloof brothers had visited his office on Monday, determined for Stern to get between their franchise and city and between the acrimony and the risk of the regrettable resolution of exiting Sacramento. It's turned so nasty between Sacramento and the Maloofs that the Kings owners threw their hands into the air and gave up.

Essentially, they asked Stern: Step down out of the Olympic Tower, take over the new arena initiative and save the Kings in Sacramento.
"The NBA has never done anything to this scope," Stern said.
Maybe that's because the NBA has never had as profound of a franchise crisis as it does now. Stern has called this a "model" franchise in the sport, "a spectacular success story," and there's a genuine urgency for the commissioner's plans to visit Sacramento in early December and begin probing the possibilities with the politicians and developers and Kings ownership.

Make no mistake: The biggest issue in the NBA isn't about toy store basketballs and bad behavior technical fouls, but the stability of its most successful franchises. Sacramento has a league-best streak of 317 sellouts at Arco Arena, which has been the loudest arena in the league and the most anchored to its franchise. Pound for pound, cowbell for cowbell, there's a good case to be made for Sacramento as the best market in the NBA.

So, there's no salvation awaiting the Maloofs and Kings elsewhere, no city that'll ever love this team and cherish it and, yes, support it the way Sacramento has done in good times and bad. It won't be Las Vegas, where the Maloofs run the Palms Casino. Nor Anaheim. Nor St. Louis. Nowhere else.

The Maloofs lost a confusing public vote on a downtown arena initiative last week, a referendum that was never clear to anyone – not the citizens, nor the Maloofs, nor the commissioner. In the end, the campaign was punctuated with allegations that the Kings owners sabotaged the vote because they themselves didn't want to move downtown.

Especially in the West, the climate for public and private arena-stadium partnerships has never been worse. Good relationships go awry over building issues; love affairs between cities and teams turn traumatic. Nothing had ever come between Sacramento and its team – not Garry St. Jean coaching, not Olden Polynice playing center, nothing until this.

The NBA could live with the New Jersey Nets leaving East Rutherford for Brooklyn, but Sacramento is a soul-bearer for the sport, a beacon of possibility for small-market teams. "Some skeptics questioned whether the NBA could succeed in Sacramento," the commissioner remembered. It's flourished there, and it is everyone's responsibility to make sure this unravels no further.

Once, the NBA had a beautiful thing going in Charlotte, but when the city grew to disdain its owner, George Shinn, the people refused to ever vote him the public funding needed to build an arena. Charlotte never should've lost the Hornets, and it's a painful memory that was still on Stern's mind this week.

"It sort of dawned on me in listening that there is really nothing more important than this," Stern said. "Maybe I could have been more helpful in some other cities, like the first time that the Hornets left Charlotte."

If he didn't do enough to save Shinn from his political mess, Stern sounds determined not to make the same mistake with the Maloofs. He goes back with their father, George, to the early 1980s when he owned the Houston Rockets. His kids, Gavin and Joe, were the whiz kids who breathed life into one of the NBA's worst basketball operations. Sacramento was dying for a winner, and the Maloofs gave it to them.

Now this seven-year fight for a new arena to replace Arco has grown acrimonious, and Stern concedes that part of his job here is to "diffuse" the two sides. These are the worst fights in sports now: communities vs. owners, public vs. private funding. The arena issue has also raged in Seattle and Portland, two longtime thriving NBA cities.

Yet nowhere could the Maloofs move the Kings and ever replicate what's happened in Sacramento. Through everything there, the fans are still the loudest in the league and still selling out night after night. Just look at Memphis now. The Grizzlies were a novelty for a couple years, a hot ticket under Jerry West and Hubie Brown, but they're gasping for air now, ranking last in attendance this season.
As a sports town, the whole identity of Sacramento is wrapped up in its pride for the Kings. A recent Sacramento Bee poll found that six out of 10 citizens declared themselves Kings fans. Still, this has turned terrible. Public officials are decrying the Maloofs as duplicitous, and newspaper columnists are taking sides with city officials and developers here, the owners there.

All of it has been polarizing, and all of it needs the commissioner's political savvy and his deft deal-making.
"The Kings and Sacramento are an NBA success story and I'm not interested in seeing the success end in failure," Stern said. "We don't accept that."

The NBA shouldn't now, nor ever. This is a fight the NBA can't lose because here's something no one would've once ever believed about Sacramento:
This is a city the league can't replace.

Adrian Wojnarowski is the national NBA columnist for Yahoo! Sports.
 
#3
Wow, I really enjoyed reading that. Not surprisingly, the better article to date about the arena doesn't come from the Bee.;)

It made me very nostalgic, and made me realize again how much I want the Kings to stay. I hope David Stern can work his magic.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#4
I am hopeful, and the Commish coming is the last best hope of saving the town from itself, but I hope people understand that Stern working his "magic" often involves him beating the living crap out of the other side until they say uncle. ;)
 
#5
I am hopeful, and the Commish coming is the last best hope of saving the town from itself, but I hope people understand that Stern working his "magic" often involves him beating the living crap out of the other side until they say uncle. ;)
Will that other side include the Bee? I hope so, because it would supply me with some great entertainment.
 

Warhawk

Give blood and save a life!
Staff member
#6
I am hopeful, and the Commish coming is the last best hope of saving the town from itself, but I hope people understand that Stern working his "magic" often involves him beating the living crap out of the other side until they say uncle. ;)
Fine by me. Someone needs to get the living crap beat out of them for letting it go this long....
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#7
Great article!



It's one I could imagine Mark Kreidler writing at one time, if the Bee hadn't pretty much silenced him (IMHO because he didn't spew enough venom in the direction of the Maloofs).
 
#8
It's one I could imagine Mark Kreidler writing at one time, if the Bee hadn't pretty much silenced him (IMHO because he didn't spew enough venom in the direction of the Maloofs).
I must add... I've also been posting on the Bee Kings forums, and I find it quite odd that the majority of the posts over there are anti-Maloof. Whenever I try to post a comment with a different perspective, my post somehow never makes it to the board.

I wonder why...... :rolleyes:
 
#9
Love the article.

Still think its going to be tough sledding. The reaction from the city/county reps was not exactly overwhelming.

However, they may not understand what is about to hit. Stern goes in to win, period.
 
#10
I don't see what stern coming in here will do. What's he gonna do, force the city into a bad deal with the maloofs? If government is involved then that means the public funding route is still being pursued. Im sorry but this will not get done if public funds are required.

If Stern is being brought in too find corporate support for a new arena then cool, that has a chance. If hes here to try to bully the city/county govt into doing more than they were willing to do for a downtown arena then I just don't see the point.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#11
I don't see what stern coming in here will do. What's he gonna do, force the city into a bad deal with the maloofs? If government is involved then that means the public funding route is still being pursued. Im sorry but this will not get done if public funds are required.

If Stern is being brought in too find corporate support for a new arena then cool, that has a chance. If hes here to try to bully the city/county govt into doing more than they were willing to do for a downtown arena then I just don't see the point.

Bully is such a...crude word. "Massage" is more like it. Roughly massage. With his fists. But "massage" is better.

He will come bearing 1001 ideas of how it can get done, contacts of any number of people who have done it before, and bearing the ultimate big stick of do it or else. But under a velvet glove of course. Funny how effective that can sometimes be, but there are no promises.

There is no "corporate" in Sacramento to get it done. Whatever happens will have to happen with the government's help, whether it be rezoning land, cutting tax breaks, or directly pulling from funds.
 
#12
Bully is such a...crude word. "Massage" is more like it. Roughly massage. With his fists. But "massage" is better.

He will come bearing 1001 ideas of how it can get done, contacts of any number of people who have done it before, and bearing the ultimate big stick of do it or else. But under a velvet glove of course. Funny how effective that can sometimes be, but there are no promises.

There is no "corporate" in Sacramento to get it done. Whatever happens will have to happen with the government's help, whether it be rezoning land, cutting tax breaks, or directly pulling from funds.
I've watched Stern a long time. He is the exact opposite of the Maloofs when it comes to negotitations. He isn't going to storm out of any meetings and he's not overly emotional. And that's what this process needs at this time.
 

CruzDude

Senior Member sharing a brew with bajaden
#13
This article made me wonder just what % of season ticket holders and serious Kings fans DON'T live in Sacramento County? I wonder if its up in the 50% range with Placer County leading the pack.

I'll bet it is miniscule this hard core fan base in Yolo County other than possibly Davis. So one can see one side of the defeated Q & R coin. But what makes no sense is the defeat of Q which would do specific things for a lot of communities not one of which was the arena.

Stern is welcome by all sides to sooth tattered nerves. But why did they get tattered in the first place? From afar, it looked like the villan was the developer who wanted no part of the arena that would take away from his value vs. his more profitable retail and housing.

Heck move the arena up to the rail yards in Roseville. That is all owned by UP or Sante Fe and I think is in Placer County. Better yet, involve an indian tribe and go the "Casino and Sports-Entertainment Complex" route. The casinos don't have sports betting (??) and would provide something for everyone.
 
#14
nice post

I don't see what stern coming in here will do. What's he gonna do, force the city into a bad deal with the maloofs? If government is involved then that means the public funding route is still being pursued. Im sorry but this will not get done if public funds are required.

If Stern is being brought in too find corporate support for a new arena then cool, that has a chance. If hes here to try to bully the city/county govt into doing more than they were willing to do for a downtown arena then I just don't see the point.
I agree entrierly with you. If he comes in with a big stick as some have described, he might was well not even come. That is not how he comes across in the interview to me. If instead he comes in and helps to brainstorm financing alternatives and plans, there is a chance. I truly believe that the final outcome, if an arena is to be built will be a blend of public financing, private financing, a ticket surcharge and the Maloofs/NBA kicking in a significant amount on money either directly or through NBA events to be held in Sacramento at some future date.

On the other hand, if he comes in as a bully and states this is the way it is..I dont think he will get very far. Sure he can play the "Kings will leave card", but he would be a fool to do that.
 
#15
I think it may be understood. Stern is smooth. People can be "smoothed" into something, they don't have to be hit over the head. And I didn't mean he was going to try and force the city into a bad deal either. I think Stern will come into Sacramento with ideas and contacts.

However, there is almost zero corporate base in Sacramento. That is not where this is going to come from and some level of government support will be absolutely necessary and, I think, appropriate.

I've posted before somewhere in here (twice actually) the % of season tickets holders by area. Sacramento County does indeed have the most.
 
#16
I find the same thing here

I must add... I've also been posting on the Bee Kings forums, and I find it quite odd that the majority of the posts over there are anti-Maloof. Whenever I try to post a comment with a different perspective, my post somehow never makes it to the board.

I wonder why...... :rolleyes:

I am sure they pick and choose which somments to put in. I have sent in posts written from different perspectives, some makew it, some dont. They do seem to play favorites with certain people. On the other side, the same could be said for this site. People on here really are not always interested in reading what other poeple have to say. Instead of being civil, some are down right insulting. ( I may be guilty myself). Especially true when you have a moderator who blatantly suggests that people ignore you. Twice
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#17
I am sure they pick and choose which somments to put in. I have sent in posts written from different perspectives, some makew it, some dont. They do seem to play favorites with certain people. On the other side, the same could be said for this site. People on here really are not always interested in reading what other poeple have to say. Instead of being civil, some are down right insulting. ( I may be guilty myself). Especially true when you have a moderator who blatantly suggests that people ignore you. Twice
And yet you continue to ignore a lot of questions/comments by people who are trying to point various things out to you here. At some point, rather than continue to try and have a meaningful discussion of the facts, one has to wonder if you're actually just interested in comments that agree with yours.

There are a lot of us here who have been here a very long time. We know and respect each other. If you're feeling put upon, I suppose I should apologize. But, on the other hand, you aren't really interacting so much as picking and choosing which parts you'll respond to.

It works both ways, you know.