Steph was clearly the regular season MVP.... And Lebron was clearly the post season MVP.
Your post reminded me of something I had been thinking about recently.
When all this talk was going on about the Warriors "possibly" being the best team of all time should they go on to win a title simply because they won ONE more regular season game than the 95-96 Bulls, it got me thinking --- why doesn't anybody seem to want to factor the postseason in?
To me, you'd have to add the W/L's from both the regular season and postseason to have a reasonable comparison and discussion.
For example:
95-96 Bulls went 72-10 then 15-3 in the postseason. 87-13 and a winning % of .870
15-16 Warriors went 73-9 then 15-9 in the postseason. 88-18 and a winning % of .830
Obviously the Warriors lost the series making all this a moot point. But had they won GM7, there would be a series debate going on right now about the Warriors being the greatest just because of the 73. However, their overall winning % would still have been lower than the Bulls, which should have ended the argument right there.
1 more win during the regular season shouldn't at all trump 4 more losses during the postseason (had they won on Sunday night). Win % should be the deciding factor if all other things are considered equal.
Just a thought.