Vet free agents and filling out the roster

dude12

Hall of Famer
When you have a bad team, with promising young talent (specifically Skal here) you don't sign a big money vet who is going to play 32-35 minutes in front of him. It's asinine. Skal needs more than 13-16 minutes a game (assuming he gets all the other minutes, which he would not). Lets say you do that and Skal becomes a monster like we all hope he will, do you bench Millsap who will be paid 35 Million plus a season on an unmovable contract?
Millsap at 30 and Skal at 18 on average. If Skal becomes a monster as you put it, then good for Sac. You trying to say is going to become an all-star this coming year? Not very realistic. Needs time. As in, when the Millsap contract is up, Skal may be that guy. I look at it this way. What about Fox actually aging someone reliable to work with......an actual all-star to help in his development.
 
You think Millsap (unless it's a straight money grab) is going to come to Sac to play fringe starter minutes to eventually be supplanted by a 2nd year player?

For $150 Million dollars I'd rather hire each of the rookies their own personal mentor, chef, motivational speaker, driver, nutritionist, personal trainer, dentist, doctor, masseuse, and manicurist.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
You think Millsap (unless it's a straight money grab) is going to come to Sac to play fringe starter minutes to eventually be supplanted by a 2nd year player?

For $150 Million dollars I'd rather hire each of the rookies their own personal mentor, chef, motivational speaker, driver, nutritionist, personal trainer, dentist, doctor, masseuse, and manicurist.
30 minutes is fringe starter minutes?
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Livingston and Mack would be my prime targets in FA for the PG position. Once thing about them is that neither are great shooters but both would be steady vets who would make rookies earn any minutes they get.
Livingston has never had that one big payday, and his time is running out. For that reason I think he can lured away from the Warriors. This might be his last chance to make some serious money. Even at that, he would probably be a bargain compared to what some other free agents would get.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
You want FA's that fit the playstyle Vlade and Joerger are trying to establish in SAC. And Vlade has been very open about his prefered playstyle - "play uptempo, play together, play defense".
Plain and simple vision, but you need guys, that are able to keep up with the legspeed of our young players. David Lee, Pau Gasol, Joe Ingles, Ilyasova, Mbah a Moute - crafty vets for sure, but not exactly athletic powerhouses able to run up and down the floor.


If we want mentors one guy should be on top of our list and that's Tony Allen. Still athletic enough to play our prefered style of basketball, used to play against much bigger guys at SF, an unselfish player, one of the best defenders over the last 10 years and the heart and soul of a blue collar team. His lack of a jumpshot will hurt his market value and we won't be forced to drastically overpay to get him here. Grizzlies reportedly plan to only offer him the league minimum, which is pretty much an insult after all he did for this team. Most title contenders desperately look for shooters to add around their main ball handlers. I think we have a reasonable chance to add him to our roster and teach our guards and forwards some Grit and Grind, which is much needed with WCS for example, who is standing in his own way with his somewhat "soft" approach.

Allen, Temple and Kosta would be a great vet core of down to earth, hardworking guys.
Disagree on Ingles. He has no problem getting up and down the floor. Good shooter, and good defender, and a team first guy. I think he's a perfect fit for the team.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
Otto Porter would be ideal but it's very unlikely given that he's restricted and Washington wants to keep him (or S&T him for PG13).

And there IS a middle ground. Collison is a steady vet who can start for now but is also good off the bench. Ditto for guys like Ingles, Patterson, Ilyasova and maybe even Tolliver.

I don't want to see Skal getting 10 mpg behind Millsap for the next three to four years. And you don't pay a guy like Millsap $30+ million a year to play 25 mpg (and $145 million over 4 years) or come off the bench.

You want veterans good enough that the young guys have to work hard to beat them out, not declining all-stars that eat up all the minutes.
This Millsap thing smells like a Vivek thing to me. He can't let go of this win now idea. I'm not opposed to winning, or even winning now, but do it within the concepts of a plan. Two or three years from, going after a Millsap type player might make some sense, but now, it's nothing but bells and whistles. You don't need to pay 30 plus mil a year for a veteran mentor.
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
Yes. Millsap played 36.5 MPG last year.

Here is the list, the players at 30 MPG are all bench players, or players who have severe deficiencies in their game either offensively or defensively.

http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/player/_/stat/minutes/sort/avgMinutes/qualified/false/count/41
You pulled post season minutes, look at regular season, most if not all guys that play 30 minutes are starters. That's not fringe PT. you don't have to agree.

I'm just saying, Kings are better off for this group of young players by going out and getting guys who can actually play.
 
Disagree on Ingles. He has no problem getting up and down the floor. Good shooter, and good defender, and a team first guy. I think he's a perfect fit for the team.
I keep coming back to him as a gettable RFA since Utah is prioritizing Hayward and Hill. An overpay 3 year deal with the 3rd year a team option. Helps us get to the salary floor and if done tonight, it's pretty debatable whether Utah matches or not while they fight for Hayward.
 

SLAB

Hall of Famer

Kingster

Hall of Famer
I have the feeling the Kings will try to spend their caproom like drunken sailors on shore leave. Mostly because I think Vivek is still "trying to win now" and meddling behind the scenes.
If Vivek is trying to "win now" he's got a strange way of showing it. According to that line of thinking he would have to believe a team comprised of 75% youngins is going to win now. (I'd like to ask his analytics guy what the historical average win percentage is for teams that have 75% of it's players 25 years of age or younger:eek:). Vivek may have his faults, but he's not delusional.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
If Vivek is trying to "win now" he's got a strange way of showing it. According to that line of thinking he would have to believe a team comprised of 75% youngins is going to win now. (I'd like to ask his analytics guy what the historical average win percentage is for teams that have 75% of it's players 25 years of age or younger:eek:). Vivek may have his faults, but he's not delusional.
He thought that if he could keep Gay & Cousins that he could convince Westbrook to come and form a "Big 3". He thought firing Malone was a good idea because the team needed a jazz conductor where everyone could improvise and be showcased individually.

Heck, you thought he was delusional to hand basketball operations over to a guy like Divac who had little to no experience.

I don't think we want to gamble too much on Vivek NOT being delusional.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
He thought that if he could keep Gay & Cousins that he could convince Westbrook to come and form a "Big 3". He thought firing Malone was a good idea because the team needed a jazz conductor where everyone could improvise and be showcased individually.

Heck, you thought he was delusional to hand basketball operations over to a guy like Divac who had little to no experience.

I don't think we want to gamble too much on Vivek NOT being delusional.
All of which implies that the MIT grad can't learn. I don't buy it.
 
Per hoopshype, it seems that the Kings and Teague are showing mutual interest...

Is there a plan to all of our madness? Teague is a quality PG. I wonder how much he is looking for....
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
All of which implies that the MIT grad can't learn. I don't buy it.
I don't think it's that he can't learn. He's obviously a bright guy. It's that he comes across as a guy who always thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.

He also laid all the blame for the Malone firing at PDA & Mully's feet and through Petrie under the bus the next season in an interview where he was trying to absolve himself for the missteps so far. And then had to retract his statements when Petrie came out and said he was lying.

A big ego and a lack of personal accountability is what I've see so far. And while he's been less visible and it's possible he's been humbled and learned a lot, there's no proof that he has. If anything, the rumbles and rumors about basketball ops and around Granger's unfortunate departure have largely suggested the opposite.

Sometimes I think maybe I'm holding too much of a grudge over things like "Stauskas? Stauskas?" and calling him Klay Curry but then I hear Buddy Hield say that Vivek told him early in the season that "we're still gonna get you" and then Ranadive say he thinks Buddy has Steph Curry potential.

Every time I think he's making progress and leaving things to his basketball people there's a story or quote about him still meddling and more evidence that he's still obsessed with the Warriors.

We may never know which one of us is right but I absolutely still don't trust him not to force the team to make stupid moves.
 
Purposely losing by not signing better players does not help in the young players development.....and this team has an abnormally large amount of 1-2 year players. I'm not advocating paying 4 years for lesser guys but getting a top tier guy on 3 years would be a tremendous help in player development. Splurge on Otto Porter yes, I'd pay Millsap for 3 yrs and a team option, not sure about Galinari, paying 8 mill for a Tayshaun Prince or Farmer or similar player so we can give away PT to the young guys and lose to get a better draft pick is a terrible plan. Young players will be playing meaningless minutes for most if the season

Tayshaun Prince is not in the league anymore. Why would you pay 8 mil for a retired player ? haha
 

dude12

Hall of Famer
Per hoopshype, it seems that the Kings and Teague are showing mutual interest...

Is there a plan to all of our madness? Teague is a quality PG. I wonder how much he is looking for....
Several reasons why this may or may not be true:

The more good PGs they are interested in, it may help drive down price for a Lawson or Collison or Teague or etc....I'm think Lawson on a cheaper contract would be ideal for them

If they really are interested in a Teague, then it hammers home the point that Joerger and staff believe that the young guys must earn everything they get to get the most out of them. I'm down with this scenario....it works.
 
Disagree on Ingles. He has no problem getting up and down the floor. Good shooter, and good defender, and a team first guy. I think he's a perfect fit for the team.
Ok. I didn't pay that much attention to Utah, but aren't they playing at the slowest pace of the whole league (93.6 in Pace stat per http://www.espn.com/nba/hollinger/teamstats/_/sort/paceFactor)?
And I don't want to act like Aileen but Ingles doesn't look like a Gazelle. ;)
But hey - I do agree, that he is a crafty basketball player.
 

funkykingston

Super Moderator
Staff member
Ok. I didn't pay that much attention to Utah, but aren't they playing at the slowest pace of the whole league (93.6 in Pace stat per http://www.espn.com/nba/hollinger/teamstats/_/sort/paceFactor)?
And I don't want to act like Aileen but Ingles doesn't look like a Gazelle. ;)
But hey - I do agree, that he is a crafty basketball player.
The Grizzlies are also one of the slowest teams in the league and Tony Allen is also nearly six years older than Ingle with a lot more mileage on him.

Both teams are defense oriented and try to maximize that by slowing down play.

Besides, being a transition team isn't about having the fastest guys. It's about having that mindset, rebounding and out letting the ball quickly and moving the ball by passing it rather than dribbling it.

The Showtime Lakers were one of the all time best transition teams and Magic wasn't exactly a speed demon and Kareem wasn't sprinting the floor like Willie.
 
If you sign the max to Teague and Porter, all of a sudden this looks like a possible playoff team

Teague/Fox/Mason
Hield/Bogdanovich/Temple/Richardson
Porter/Jackson
Skal/Giles
WCS/Koufas/Papa
 
The Grizzlies are also one of the slowest teams in the league and Tony Allen is also nearly six years older than Ingle with a lot more mileage on him.

Both teams are defense oriented and try to maximize that by slowing down play.

Besides, being a transition team isn't about having the fastest guys. It's about having that mindset, rebounding and out letting the ball quickly and moving the ball by passing it rather than dribbling it.

The Showtime Lakers were one of the all time best transition teams and Magic wasn't exactly a speed demon and Kareem wasn't sprinting the floor like Willie.
Ok. Maybe you are right. Maybe Ingles is one of those guys, who are "sneaky athletic" :D
 
I will stop following Sacramento Kings if they sign Teague. Would be so Sacramento-like decision to draft point guard at 5 and another in early 2nd round and then overpaying for an average 29 year old point guard who doesnt fit in our timeline at all.