Not at all. There were multiple reports about the front office being concerned about Rubio's maturity and readiness to tackle the NBA grind. The one I just mentioned was one, and it was completely appropriate to what I was responding to.
If Rubio is immature because his mother cut his steak, then what does that make Evans for being involved in a homicide? I'd like to clarify that I'm not trying to drag you into Rubio vs. Evans, but you're giving reasons/excuses as to why the Kings chose Evans instead of him, so I'm arguing against that. So the standards have to be consistent or the excuses don't fly. At the time of the draft, Rubio had what? Five years of professional experience, as well as experience in international tournaments and in the olympic gold medal game? Evans had what? One year of college experience?